A fork is pointless. All of the points you made are things that would be welcome changes in GNUstep.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Sergii Stoian <stoyan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Gregory Casamento wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Sergii Stoian <stoyan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> <SNIP> >>> >>> Sure, you're right! I'm start thinking that fork of gui+back for some >>> period >>> of time is not such silly thing... >> >> Forking would be bad for the project in general. In my opinion a fork >> would only cause confusion. If what you're referring to here is a >> branch within the GNUstep repo, then that's fine... but I fork of the >> project isn't really going to be productive. > > Sure, this time it's better to say as branch not fork. > >> Also, I'm wondering what the reason for the fork would be. > > See my mail to Fred. > >> GC > > -- > Sergii Stoian > -- Gregory Casamento Open Logic Corporation, Principal Consultant ## GNUstep Chief Maintainer yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa (240)274-9630 (Cell), (301)362-9640 (Home) _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
