ah! cool, then. :) On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:26 PM, <hansfba...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > 2009/11/19 Gregory Casamento <greg.casame...@gmail.com>: >> >> Hans, >> >> The only thing I'm wondering is why "pear" in particular? I think >> it's good, because it's imaginative. Additionally, I wouldn't have >> wanted the tool to be called gsxcodebuild or gspbxbuild or even >> gsbuild as I have a distinct allergy to things being prefixed with GS >> simply because they can be. Part of this comes from having committed >> the sin myself in the form of my "gopen" tool. :) The only reason >> it's not "open" is because there is an open keyword/tool on most >> versions of Linux with which it would conflict. O_o > > pearbuild because it builds apple software but in an non-apple environment, > and there is a bit of impedance mismatch here. > And because the prefix still would be PB.
-- Gregory Casamento Open Logic Corporation, Principal Consultant ## GNUstep Chief Maintainer yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa (240)274-9630 (Cell), (301)362-9640 (Home) _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
