> Yes, it really sounds like we could share the effort. I am willing to > implement the missing functions in Corebase to provide a common base for > CFLite and GNUstep corebase that can be used to build Opal on. Of course > this is only worth the effort if you want to participate in Opal > development. > What I didn't understand is what you plan to use OpenVG for. Isn't cairo > by itself sufficient? Or do you want to use OpenVG as the cairo backend > (in the cairo sense of backend)? >
Actually I have started this project as a proprietary one because I am interested almost exclusively by embedded world(Windows ce, nokia maemo, samsung) and I wanted to allow company to easily port their iphone apps to other platforms. If I don't manage to do it I will open source code but for now it will stay close. About openVG, there is almost a one to one connection between openVG and iPhone api, besides I am using a commercial implementation built above opengl es to benefit from hardware acceleration when possible. But I must admit that cairo is a good candidate too, that's why I am interested in both to make some comparisons. However if I don't become rich ;-), I will contribute to your project. Note : When I said that your stuff is complicated I wanted to say that getting a working objective-C 2.0 compiler on non-darwin platforms(windows ce for instance) is not an easy task. That's why I am thinking more and more to only implement CoreGraphics and use c++ or ooc (new language that actually emits standard C code) for the high-level framework. _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev