On 27 Feb 2010, at 17:15, David Chisnall wrote: > Thanks for the report, I'll take a look. I don't think I'd tested > @synchronized() with a class as an argument - it seems like a very strange > thing to do when there are safe ways of achieving the same result with much > less overhead.
Good point, but one which is probably not obvious to most people. Certainly a new ObjC programmer is likely to think that anything which is part of the 'standard' must be good. You are probably in a better position than anyone else to be aware of precisely what parts of ObjectiveC-2 are most efficient or inefficient, and how they compare to the traditional ways of doing things. Have you considered producing a paper describing those differences? If we had them quantified we would have a really good guide for people to know when to use new features and when to avoid them (and when it really doesn't matter). Just a suggestion ... _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
