My point was simply that David may have some specific facts with respect to how he developed the library which were important. As you can see, he did.
Nevertheless, now that everyone has had a chance to weigh in, I don't see any point in continuing this thread. Later, GC On Tuesday, September 14, 2010, Richard Frith-Macdonald <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 13 Sep 2010, at 22:24, Gregory Casamento wrote: > >> If you're asking me I would say it's very unfair to make an assertion >> regarding someones work, then back out of/refuse to participate in the >> discussion which results. > > Not really when it's a simple statement of fact which anyone interested could > verify by looking at svn and which David would confirm. I can see why Nicola > would not want to bother wasting time arguing about it with people who just > haven't checked for themselves. -- Gregory Casamento - GNUstep Lead/Principal Consultant, OLC, Inc. yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa (240)274-9630 (Cell) _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
