On 17 Sep 2010, at 10:11, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: > However, I think it would be good to maintain clear separation ... with > CoreBase being a subproject, and continuing to be built as a separate library > (so not quite the same as the existing additions subproject, which is > actually merged into the base library except on OSX where its a separate > library used with Foundation).
That's exactly what I thought I was suggesting - sorry if it wasn't clear. > You could have the gnustep-base package build and install both by default, > but have an easy configure-time option to control exactly what gets > built/installed. Well, we'll need to install the CoreBase headers anyway if we want the string.h and other stuff to be included by Foundation.h (as it is on OS X. Nicola: I wonder if this alters the performance of precompiled headers - the preprocessed Foundation.h header on OS X is significantly larger than with GNUstep, in part because it includes all of this other stuff. David _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
