All, I'm forced to point out that the only reason why we named these libraries gui and base was because, at the time, we were worried about copyright/trademark issues. I simply think it would be easier to name things after what they represent in Cocoa/OpenStep in the repository.
I really don't see this as a complex or unreasonable change. Naturally, it would be done so as not to impact anyone's work. GC On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Stef Bidi <[email protected]> wrote: > I just want to state that I agree with most opinions here: the name isn't > important. However, I came across GNUstep first... I wouldn't know what > it's like for a Cocoa developer first interacting with GNUstep. > > As I stated in other discussion, I think the website does a whole lot more > to hamper adoption than almost anything else. I don't have a lot of free > time (work and grad school) but I'd like to be involved with the website > team. > > Stef > > _______________________________________________ > Gnustep-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev > > -- Gregory Casamento - GNUstep Lead/Principal Consultant, OLC, Inc. yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa (240)274-9630 (Cell) _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
