> GCC 4.1 for example does have -mrelax on at least some targets on which > --relax does something, but not everywhere, so the portable version > would seem to be -Wl,--relax.
Yes, that would be solution if we were trying to pass --relax to the linker ;-) But we need to do something different - we need to prevent GCC from silently passing --relax to the linker, which is quite a different problem :-( On the relevant targets, GCC avoids passing '--relax' only if it sees '-r' or '-mno-relax' on the command-line. As testing for support for -mno-relax is too complicated, we just decided (at least for this release) to simply use '-r' (like in all previous releases) when using GCC for partial linking. Better ideas would be welcome. Thanks _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
