On 18.04.2011 14:43, Quentin Mathé wrote:
Le 18 avr. 2011 à 00:29, Eric Wasylishen a écrit :
Author: ericwa
Date: Mon Apr 18 00:29:18 2011
New Revision: 32880
URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/gnustep?rev=32880&view=rev
Log:
back/cairo: CairoFontEnumerator.m: Replace -handleKey:selector:valueClass: and
-handleKey:selector: methods with macros.
Modified:
libs/back/trunk/Source/cairo/CairoFontEnumerator.m
Just curious… What is the motivation behind this change, given that macros are
harder to reason about and debug than methods? Is this a performance
improvement?
The reason was me complaining :-)
I don't like code that need to do respondsTo: checks on self. In this
specific case this is something that the compiler could do and with
macros the compiler should be able to check whether the class implements
that methods or not.
Performance shouldn't be much of an issue here.
Next time I will complain to the mailing list, so the blame goes
directly to me.
Fred
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
