Hi Fred, Le samedi 21 janvier 2012 à 16:17 +0100, Fred Kiefer a écrit : > I just did run the tests for base and get 12 failures. One is the know > +initialize bug of the gcc runtime. The other 11 come from the > NSNumberFormatter: > > > base/NSNumberFormatter/basic10_4.m: > Failed test: basic10_4.m:75 ... default 10.4 format same as Cocoa > Failed test: basic10_4.m:82 ... round up for fractional part >0.5 > Failed test: basic10_4.m:87 ... round down for fractional part <0.5 > Failed test: basic10_4.m:93 ... minus sign assigned correctly > Failed test: basic10_4.m:111 ... format width set correctly > Failed test: basic10_4.m:115 ... positive prefix set correctly > Failed test: basic10_4.m:119 ... default padding position is > before prefix > Failed test: basic10_4.m:124 ... numeric and space padding OK > Failed test: basic10_4.m:137 ... positive prefix is set > correctly for currency style > Failed test: basic10_4.m:141 ... prefix and suffix used properly > Failed test: basic10_4.m:145 ... negativeFormat used for -ve number > --- Running tests in base/NSObject ---
I'm getting some of these too. After setting LANG to C the tests pass fine. Philippe _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
