Hi Chan,

> In this circumstance, I would replace GNUstep with Apple's CoreFoundation 
> (it's open, despite branded with Apple) and lay Cocotron on it, then use 
> GNUstep to provide everything that is missing. Cocotron is an implementation 
> of Foundation (GNUstep Base) using open sourced code and based on Apple's 
> CoreFoundation. It will be less effort to do that if you are using FreeBSD. I 
> have Linux so it is a lot more work to do.

thanks for the advice, but I'll stay with GNUstep (for personal reasons). IMO 
CoreFoundation is a giant mistake anyways, so I'm not too keen on getting that 
working (on FreeBSD) anyways.

I've just posted my findings on the current GNUstep corebase issues to let 
others on this list know about them, ideally before they waste too much time on 
the same problems as I did. Don't get me wrong: I appreciate the work Stefan 
Bidi did with GNUstep corebase, but, as I already said, I'm not very eager to 
spend much time to help improve the current codebase.
 
Cheers,

  Marcus

-- 
Marcus Müller  .  .  .  http://www.mulle-kybernetik.com/znek/



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev

Reply via email to