On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 09:07 +0000, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: > On 13 Mar 2013, at 08:12, Luboš Doležel wrote: > > > So guys, what do we do? :-) > > > > I'd be unhappy if this topic just faded away... > > I like the idea of changing the format of literal strings to hold a hash > (obviously we need to get buy-in from a gcc developer, since gcc's our > reference/standard compiler), but I'm not sure there's any point storing a > cfTypeID field when we already have an isa field to tell us what type of > object we have. >
I like it too. In that way, everyone will benefit of that and constant strings could stay in read only segment of the process. > > _______________________________________________ > Gnustep-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev -- Jean-Charles BERTIN Axinoe - Software Engineer Tel.: (+33) (0)1.80.82.59.23 Fax : (+33) (0)1.80.82.59.29 Skype: jcbertin Web: <http://www.axinoe.com/> Certificate Authority: <https://ca.axinoe.com/axinoe-root.crt>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
