On 20 May 2013, at 10:23, Luboš Doležel <lu...@dolezel.info> wrote:
> Hi, > > for proper support of non-native (OS X) bundles on Linux/Darling, I need some > changes in NSBundle. > I've looked into GNUstep's code and I can achieve most stuff with various > tricks. But some things would lead to unnecessary code duplication and that's > where I'd like to ask you whether a patch would be acceptable. > > ======= > 1) > I'd like to add > > +[NSBundle _addFrameworkFromClassWithPath: (Class)frameworkClass > :(NSString*)path] > > which would obviously be an extended version of _addFrameworkFromClass with > the only change: it would use the path passed in arguments unless NULL. This > is needed because dladdr() won't work for OS X dynamic libraries loaded by > Darling. > I think this change is very unintrusive. > > ======= > > 2) > GSPrivateLoadModule() also contains platform-specific things. Would it be > acceptable to add [self _loadModule: .....] called from -load that would in > GNUstep simply call GSPrivateLoadModule()? > This would enable me to override -[NSBundle _loadModule] and let myself > decide whether to use GNUstep's mechanisms or my own. > Both those changes sound reasonable to me, as long as they are clearly commented so that someone (like me) doesn't come along later and, forgetting what they are for, remove them because the look unneccessary. _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
