libsupc++.a does have symbols in it. nm -g reports no symbols on libsupc++.so.1.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Maxthon Chan <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh it just hit me - maybe you want libsupc++.a instead of .so, which (may) > ask for libc++ to build. > > I used to simply force linking libobjc2 against libc++ but that tend to > make app load a little slower and consume some more memory (and then defeat > this performance penalty by enforcing link-time optimization in Base and > GUI). > > 在 2013-6-13，上午6:48，Frank Rehwinkel <[email protected]> 写道： > > I've checked the libsupc++ libraries are the same on the host as in the > jail. Same sizes, same symbolic links. > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:39 PM, David Chisnall <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 12 Jun 2013, at 23:35, Frank Rehwinkel <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > -- Using /usr/lib/libsupc++.so as the C++ runtime library >> >> Hmm, this should work. The C++ runtime symbols are missing from this >> library? >> >> David >> >> -- Sent from my Apple II >> >> > >
_______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
