If someone really does not need ObjC stuff here, they will go to CFLite instead.
On Jun 17, 2013, at 20:57, Stefan Bidi <[email protected]> wrote: > I was specifically trying not to link against the ObjC runtime and > gnustep-base. The reason for that is because I would like to support > building corebase without needing all the ObjC stuff for whoever wants to do > that, and so I also want to make sure the tests reflect that case. > > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:46 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald > <[email protected]> wrote: > > PS. adding support for .c and .cc files seems a little unnecessary since > testing of C and C++ code is already supported (in .m and .mm files). > > It's true that when you test C code in a .m file, you do get the ObjC runtime > library and the gnustep-base library added to the link command, but if you > don't use them that seems harmless, and if you want to link alternative > libraries which export the same symbols, you could do so with a little care > about the link order you use. > > I guess the point is mainly familiarity/clarity ... people might just want to > put a .c extension on their files rather than a .m extension. The patch is > good to allow that. > > _______________________________________________ > Gnustep-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
_______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
