On 02/03/2014 10:10 PM, Stefan Bidi wrote: > I really appreciate the work you're doing on corebase. I really haven't > had any time to do anything recently, but I have been keeping up with > your changes. > > Personally, what I would like to see is an agglomeration of all the > related projects. For example, why can't the corenetwork library be > brought into corebase? No reason why these 2 libraries are split.
The project's directory had already been created when I started working on it. But possibly only because they're separate on OS X. > To answer your question, I think that sounds fine, but why not just > override NSRunLoop's designated initializer and just return NSCFRunLoop > (or whatever you want to call it)? Wouldn't that be easier than > checking for a symbol? Or am I missing something? Well... method swizzling is considered "ugly" and overriding via categories is "not guaranteed to work". At least that's what I've heard when I examined such possibilities for other stuff. -- Luboš Doležel _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
