Hey guys,

On Saturday, March 21, 2015, Fred Kiefer <fredkie...@gmx.de> wrote:

> Am 21.03.2015 um 12:14 schrieb David Chisnall:
> > On 20 Mar 2015, at 22:29, Gregory Casamento
> > <greg.casame...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>
> >> BTW, one thing I've been thinking of doing lately is creating
> >> "rpm" and "deb" repositories so that we can distribute our own
> >> packages in a fashion similar to how the mono project does.
> >
> > It's been a while since I ran Linux, but I found this kind of thing
> > from upstream to be highly counter-productive.  The dependencies are
> > always subtly wrong in the third-party repos (because different
> > distros name things slightly differently, even between forks from the
> > same base) and it reduces the incentive for distros to create their
> > own packages.
>
> I tend to agree with David here. Abstract packages are of no use. We
> will need packages for specific distributions and we already have those
> for a few systems. If we really need more it would be rather easy to
> extend, for example, the Open Build Service setup for GNustep
> (https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=X11%3AGNUstep) to
> include more repositories, as they call distributions. Of course this is
> only useful if somebody takes over the responsibility for these new
> distributions. As David already pointed out there are always some subtle
> changes that need to be taken care of for each distribution.
>
> Fred


I see both of your points and agree.

GC


-- 
Gregory Casamento
GNUstep Lead Developer / OLC, Principal Consultant
http://www.gnustep.org - http://heronsperch.blogspot.com
http://ind.ie/phoenix/
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev

Reply via email to