That's what I figured it was. I'm going to change to code in CoreBase to reflect these changes, too. Thanks
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald < richardfrithmacdon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 14 Jul 2015, at 16:47, Stefan Bidigaray <stefanb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I was wondering if anyone with the right credentials had seen this > e-mail? I would gladly make the changes, but I don't know how to add new > files to the website. To me, the solution seems pretty simple: (1) add > "plist-1.0.dtd" (or whatever) to the gnustep.org website, (2) modify the > code to point to it, (3) modify the plist version attribute to "1.0". The > only thing I can do without introducing introducing the new file is correct > the file name from plist-0_9.xml to plist-0_9.dtd. I don't feel > comfortable bumping the version number without also introducing the new dtd > file. > > > > Regards > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Stefan Bidigaray <stefanb...@gmail.com> > > Date: Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 8:40 PM > > Subject: XML Property List code in GNUstep Base > > To: GNUstep Developer <gnustep-dev@gnu.org> > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > I'm working on the CFPropertyList implementation in CoreBase and been > checking some of the code in NSPropertyList.m to compare against my own > assumptions. > > > > The code in NSPropertyList.m writes the following in the header: > > <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//GNUstep//DTD plist 0.9//EN" " > http://www.gnustep.org/plist-0_9.xml> > > I see 2 problem here: > > > > 1. First, http://www.gnustep.org/plist-0_9.xml does not exist, > http://www.gnustep.org/plist-0_9.dtd does, though. Seems like a simple > oversight, but it should still be fixed. > > > > 2. Why is GNUstep using plist version 0.9? Every example I've gotten > from a friend's Mac uses plist version 1.0. I compared Apple DTD ( > http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd) against our own and they > contain the same exact information. > > I missed that … I guess I can change it. > > The answer to the question about why we are using 0.9 is that, at the > point when we implemented it, Apple was using 0.9 too, and I guess nobody > noticed when they changed at some point.
_______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
