On 26/12/15 13:09, David Chisnall wrote: > Note that it’s only libsupc++/libc++abi/libcxxrt that makes a difference.
Sure. I just mentioned it improperly. Of course, I meant libsupc++/libc++abi, since this is what used in CrystaX NDK for Android. Not sure about libcxxrt - what exactly you mean here? > libstdc++ / libc++ can both happily live on top of either of these and they > should all present the same ABI (though I think libc++abi is actually broken > in this particular regard). Well, I'm not sure about libc++abi right now, but we're going to make all this working for Android the same way as for GNU/Linux. In other words, if it works for GNU/Linux, but not for Android, it will be subject to fix for me. Anyway, I know that libsupc++ is not broken, so this would be the first step to do. After that, I'll look on libc++abi. -- Dmitry Moskalchuk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
