Hi Gregory,
On 02/28/16 15:48, Gregory Casamento wrote:
Unfortunately, that's really not good enough. People don't want to
browse our rather screwed up SVN repositories in order to get an idea
of what GNUstep is about. Browsing the repos is the last step to this
process, not the first.
I deleted the rest of this message because this first statement of
yours is a complete and total nonstarter which makes discussing any
further points put forth unnecessary.
wow, when you start deleting stuff and declaring stuff unnecessary, it
is not a good way to make a discussion.
Of course SVN is the end. I just said that there it is actually quite
clear, but perhaps not elsewhere.
I understand what Richard is pointing at (and also remembering that what
we registered with FSF is not totally worthless), but less how Richards
proposals can be applied in a sort of next steps.
Perhaps a redo/revamp of the "External Related Sites" is a first go, as
I proposed.
Also, perhaps, we could change the categories in the bug reporting
system to adhere to the different sub-projects. I noticed, eg, that we
have generally "applications" but not "GWorkspace".
Riccardo
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
