> Am 30.06.2016 um 01:23 schrieb Stefan Bidigaray <[email protected]>: > > LIBRARY COMBOS > I don't understand why these are still needed. Can't the library combo be > inferred from the architecture triplet, nowadays?
I'm still using both apple-apple-apple and gnu-gnu-gnu on OS X (the latter requires a few manual tweaks to get it working though). So I guess my answer to your question is no. > Maybe this was something that made sense when GNUstep first started, as there > were so many completing ObjC libraries? Currently, I'm not entirely convinced > this makes sense. For example, if you are deploying for apple-apple-apple > your arch-triplet is x86_64-apple-darwin (or is it x86_64-apple-apple? I > don't know), right? Is anything besides gnu-gnu-gnu and apple-apple-apple > still around? As far as I can tell, adding this directory makes our > non-flattened system incompatible with the Debian multi-arch system. And > honestly, I'm not sure it is still buying us anything of value. It should be > up to the person compiling GNUstep to ensure that they are not mixing the > GNUstep libraries and something else that might be compatible. I mean, this > person should know. Wolfgang _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
