> On 25 Jun 2017, at 23:31, Daniel Ferreira (theiostream) <bnm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Ivan Vučica <i...@vucica.net> wrote: >> I wouldn't mind a pull request setting up an off-the-shelf CI system, >> in addition to Gregory's existing setup. (I don't know where the >> 'stuff is broken' emails are going these days.) > > I just wonder what sort of setup should be used. For base/gui/back I > can envision, ideally: > > 1) GNU/Linux with oldest gcc we intend to support > 2) FreeBSD with oldest gcc we intend to support > > and for base/gui/back plus all the others: > > 3) GNU/Linux with modern gcc > 4) GNU/Linux with modern clang > 5) FreeBSD with modern gcc > 6) FreeBSD with modern clang > > I'd appreciate help in determining what that "oldest gcc" would be. > Also, we have the problem that Travis CI does not build on top of any > BSD aside from OSX itself, or on some targets like SunOS which I > believe we still support. I don't know if we officially support > Windows despite our win32 code in the codebase, and how tricky *that* > would be to set up in any CI server.
Note: Travis has an open issue tracking their lack of FreeBSD support. The more people who +1 it, the more likely it is to happen. David _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
