> On 11 Dec 2017, at 07:45, Fred Kiefer <fredkie...@gmx.de> wrote: > > I was hoping for Richard to step up here. If he doesn’t response today, we > should try to go ahead ourselves. I could help later today with the news.texi > file. My impression is that we should use a version number of 1.26.0 as quite > a few changes have piled up. > The release process itself would again be on your side, as you have the > required key for it. It would be great to have this one out tonight to reduce > the confusion that comes from the gui release. > Not sure whether we need another gui release to document the increased base > version. I think we could do without it.
I was away, and just got home last night. I had intended to make a release befoire christmas. As far as I know there should be nothng that breaks binary compatibility (so I'd have made it 1.25.1), but if people want a new library version number I don't see any problem with that. _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
