> On 29 Jan 2018, at 08:28, Fred Kiefer <[email protected]> wrote: > > re is a problem with these numbers. Coverity did only analyse about one third > of the Objective-C files in GNUstep base and most likely only the smaller > files. Coverity at the moment has issues with Objective-C protocols and only > works with files where there are no references to any. That means we don’t > know how many of the 1 million lines where actually checked for defects. The > number 0.01 is basically meaningless :-)
:-( Where do I look to find out about this? I don't think gnustep-base actually *uses* protocols much, so perhaps we can figure out ways to work around this limitation? _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
