On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 5:24 PM, Richard Frith-Macdonald < richard.frith-macdon...@theengagehub.com> wrote:
> > > According to Apple, the -drain method is a synonym for -release (or > -dealloc since you don't retain autorelease pools). > So yes, if youi drain a pool the next time an object is autoreleased it > goes into the parent pool of the one you drained. > Your code above should crash at the point where you call [innerPool > release] since you are sending the -release message to a deallocated object. > Thank you! I guess I never read that part of the NSAutoreleasePool docs. > I think the -drain method name is unintuitive. To me it sounds like it > ought to do the same as the gnustep-specific -emptyPool method (a more > efficient equivalent to draining/releasing the pool and immediately > creating a new one). > That's what I assumed it was doing: releasing the members of the pool, while not releasing the pool itself. Thank you!
_______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
