On 10 Apr 2018, at 07:13, Sebastian Reitenbach <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Am Dienstag, April 10, 2018 00:28 CEST, Riccardo Mottola > <[email protected]> schrieb: > >> Hi, >> >> On 2018-04-07 18:04:12 +0000 David Chisnall <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>> No idea if either of them are relevant, but I’ve just pushed two fixes for >>>> > memory-related errors in -base. One writes some data through an > >>>> uninitialised pointer when an exception is thrown and the platform doesn’t >>>> > provide backtrace. The other treats things as GSString instances even >>>> if > they aren’t and so can potentially dereference an invalid pointer. >>>> Either of these could cause random crashes in some usage on some platforms. >> >> >> unfortunatley not. I still get a hard crash while running "plmerge". For me >> it is OpenBSD only, but I got that Gregory has issues on linux to. >> >> I was able to compile with debug and get a better starcktrace, although I >> think it is corrupted and loops.. or we have some case of /thread recurision > > while debugging GNUMail, I also tried gnustep-base from git, and I saw the > very same backtrace, when I tried to rebuild gnustep-gui afterward. > Threre I saw it happen in make_services.
This looks like the bug with non-fragile ivars appearing to have different offsets in different libraries. If I give you a clang patch, are you able to test it? David _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
