The Gorm changes David committed warrant a release of the app.   So I
concur with doing a release.

On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 10:24 AM Gürkan Myczko <gur...@phys.ethz.ch> wrote:

> Hi
>
> I think it would be great to have that new release for the next Debian
> release which is going to happen soon:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianBuster
>
> Happy new year!
>
>
>
>
> Gürkan
> Tel. 076 436 72 00
>
> On Jan 1, 2019, at 15:32, Stefan Bidigaray <stefanb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2019, 07:50 Fred Kiefer <fredkie...@gmx.de wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > Am 01.01.2019 um 12:44 schrieb Ivan Vučica <i...@vucica.net>:
>> >
>> > Hi maintainers,
>> >
>> > If you want, I can spend some time cutting a release. It has been a
>> while since the last one. Do we need a one? Are there critical bugs we
>> fixed? Are there critical bugs blocking the release?
>>
>> There weren’t that many changes to GNustep in the last year, but cutting
>> a new release would be nice. I have been working on a few changes to the
>> opal backend to get PikoPixel working in that setup. Having a release
>> deadline in about two weeks could motivate me to finish these changes :-)
>>
>>
>> > There’s a pull request for icu-config removal that we could apply to
>> -base. It might warrant a release.
>>
>> Yes, I have been thinking about that pull request. The problem is that
>> this will break icu on systems where the pkg config for icu isn’t present.
>> I think this has been around for at least six years. This should be long
>> enough even for GNUstep standards. :-(
>>
>
> The icu-config script used to be the recommended method for finding the
> libraries. I just liked at the documentation and pkg-config is now
> recommended, so making this change would just guarantee future
> compatibility. Per the latest ICU documentation, icu-config is deprecated.
>
> > If the answer is yes, if you can help me by updating the
>> (non-autogenerated) pieces of the release notes, that would help me a bit.
>> >
>> > If the answer is yes, I would be cutting the release on a weekend.
>>
>> Great, but please give me a bit more time.
>>
>> Fred
>>
>>
>> PS: Did you see the two pull requests for back today? The first one, that
>> wasn’t a real pull request rather a question about the code, has triggered
>> me to rethink the removal of RContext. Perhaps somebody else could have a
>> look too?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnustep-dev mailing list
>> Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnustep-dev mailing list
> Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnustep-dev mailing list
> Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
>
-- 
Gregory Casamento
GNUstep Lead Developer / OLC, Principal Consultant
http://www.gnustep.org - http://heronsperch.blogspot.com
http://ind.ie/phoenix/
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev

Reply via email to