Hi all,

We are still using a non-expiring 1024-bit DSA key to sign our
releases. If we're spending time on signing the releases in the first
place, this seems a bit silly.

I propose we phase out this key; after this batch of releases, we
should use it to sign a new key and then discontinue its use. I am not
sure whether to suggest revocation, or setting some short expiration
date.

If we agree to do that, I can do this, and coordinate delivering the
new key(s) to maintainers off-list. If I am generating the new key,
I'd also sign the key with my personal key, which has some
FOSDEM-signing-party signatures on it.

Let me know what you think.

Reply via email to