David, My previous message was meant to build on your position. Thank you for clarifying your position.
That’s entirely your decision as the maintainer of libobjc2, and I expect contributors to respect the policies of the projects they’re contributing to. I’ll make sure everyone understands that AI-generated reviews or analyses should not be submitted for libobjc2. If someone believes they’ve found a genuine issue, they’re welcome to investigate it independently and submit a report that they can personally explain and defend. Thanks for making your expectations clear. Yours, GC On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 11:43 AM David Chisnall <[email protected]> wrote: > On 13 Apr 2026, at 16:37, Todd White <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi David, > > All good feedback - and certainly pick and choose what you wish to take > advantage of / feel is of value. > > I will go back and look at the comments you made on RB-1, RB-2, etc. and > reintegrate those questions into the 2nd pass Claude is making through the > code and advise. > > > For various ethical reasons, I would prefer that you did not. I have no > desire to contribute to the various harms that these systems are > responsible for. > > Given the very low signal to noise ratio from the reports so far, I don’t > intend to triage anything else coming from your plagiarism machine. > > Other parts of GNUstep may have different policies. > > David > > -- Gregory Casamento GNUstep Lead Developer / Black Lotus, Principal Consultant http://www.gnustep.org - http://heronsperch.blogspot.com https://www.openhub.net/languages/objective_c
