Hi Nikos, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[email protected]> skribis:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:59 PM Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Nikos, >> >> Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[email protected]> skribis: >> >> > Would you like to send a merge request so we see whether these pass >> > the CI tests? >> >> The new GitLab ToS looked obnoxious to me so I didn’t agree to them, and >> thus lost my ability to interact there. >> >> My preference is to use email, but if merge requests are more convenient >> for you I can do like everyone else and happily ignore the issues; WDYT? > > I am not sure what do you mean by ignoring the issues. Could you > elaborate? I meant ignore the issues with these ToS, such as the “Indemnification” section at <https://about.gitlab.com/terms/>; fundamentally, I want to contribute to GnuTLS, I don’t want to have to deal with GitLab B.V., but I think we already discussed it before. I also find it sad that a distributed VCS led to more centralization than we had before… I understand this service is convenient, in particular for many newcomers, but IMO we shouldn’t be blind to its costs. > With the email approach someone else would have to open the MR, check > any errors and report back. I can do it this time, though I don't want > to commit to such a role. > > I've opened the MR at: > https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/merge_requests/1018 > > The test results are at: > https://gitlab.com/nmav/gnutls/pipelines/64750155 Thanks for doing this! Like I said, I’ll resignedly accept the ToS and do that in the future if that’s more convenient for you. > (the patches seem to miss the signoff-by flag) The convention in GnuTLS is to add ’Signed-off-by’ by the author? Thanks, Ludo’. _______________________________________________ Gnutls-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnutls-help
