Hi Simon, Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> writes:
> I pushed the guile-gnutls git repository to codeberg: > > https://codeberg.org/guile-gnutls/guile-gnutls > > This is a manually maintained repository to explore if we could move > guile-gnutls to codeberg. What do you think? I would support such a move. > I feel I don't have a lot authority over this project, so I don't know > if there are any opinions on this -- I tried to cc some possibly > relevant people (sorry if I missed anyone, anyone else on gnutls-help > feel free to chime in with opinions). I'd like to co-maintain this > (send me your codeberg username), and I'm also okay reverting back to > gitlab if people think moving codeberg is a negative. IMO you have all the authority to do it! > Further things I'm aware of: > > - GitLab issue tracker - should we keep this read-write, or turn it > read-only? Is there any point in migrating issues to codeberg? Is > such migration even possible? > > - Gitlab Merge requests - same question I see you merely cloned the repo instead of migrating the project. I would suggest migrating the project (including issues and PRs): it’s a super easy and mostly lossless process with Codeberg. I think you’ll first need to delete this repo and then click on “+” in the blue banner at the top and then “New migration”. > - GitLab Pipelines - this is a very important QA tool and I wouldn't > want to release anything without having all those tests. So whatever > we do, the GitLab CI/CD will be important for some time still. I > don't speak Forgejo CI/CD but will try to learn, but it appears far > behind GitLab CI/CD feature-wise. I don't see any problem having a > GitLab read-only mirror project for CI/CD purposes, I do that for some > other projects without GitLab presence. Yeah, that I don’t know. There’s the integrated Woodpecker CI but I’ve never used it. > - GitLab release pages - I've been using this feature as a learning > excercise, but I'm not sure how important it is. I guess codeberg has > something similar. I find these pages rather ugly, and prefer old > school HTTPS/FTP publication with stable URLs and a mirror network. > Savannah and ftp.gnu.org provides this, and we can continue use that > (or not). I would just use Git tags these days, but then that rules out complicated pre-processing à la Gnulib. > Btw, I pushed a copy of GitLab 'master' branch to a 'main' branch on > Codeberg since it seemed like a nice time to change branch name too. Agreed. Thanks, Ludo’. _______________________________________________ Gnutls-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnutls-help
