Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=4081034 By: keithmarshall
An interesting suggestion, thanks; I'll certainly consider it. The lookup tables I'm using at present are faster; I keep them as ordered tuples, and do a binary search for the ISO-639 and ISO-3166 `keys', extracted from the environment strings. OTOH, your method relieves me of the burden of maintaining my lookup tables, and it saves the memory overhead for storing them; and maybe the loss of performance resulting from the sequential search isn't too critical, with today's processors. Regards, Keith. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=74807 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ GnuWin32-Users mailing list GnuWin32-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuwin32-users
