Thanks for the information Aravind. Can you confirm whether GoCD Version: 
20.6.0 (12005-12860aac6351e2a353728c7d7913f34d741c63e0) is vulnerable with 
log4j ?

On Monday, December 13, 2021 at 6:32:25 PM UTC+5:30 Aravind SV wrote:

> Hello Pranav,
>
> GoCD's underlying log implementation for slf4j is logback, and not log4j. 
> Have you been able to *exploit* this? That would be strange because there 
> is no log4j JAR bundled with GoCD at all.
>
> However, we will check again and wait for your response (to the question 
> about the exploit).
>
> Cheers,
> Aravind
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 12:58 PM Pranav Joshi <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
>> Hey Aravind, 
>> We found this article http://slf4j.org/log4shell.html :
>>
>> The SLF4J API is just an API which lets message data go through. As such, 
>> using log4j 2.x even via SLF4J does not mitigate the vulnerability. 
>>
>> However, as mentioned previously, log4j 1.x is safe with respect to 
>> CVE-2021-44228. Thus, if your SLF4J provider/binding is 
>> *slf4j-logj12.jar*, you are safe regarding CVE-2021-44228.
>>
>> If you are using *log4j-over-slf4j.jar* with SLF4J API, you are safe 
>> unless the underlying implementation is log4j 2.x.
>>
>> On Monday, December 13, 2021 at 6:25:03 PM UTC+5:30 Aravind SV wrote:
>>
>>> Ha. As I write this ... someone seems to have brought this up. Please 
>>> watch this or the discussion for updates.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 12:53 PM Aravind SV <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Just a quick note to say that there is a discussion happening around 
>>>> the log4j vulnerability and GoCD here 
>>>> <https://github.com/gocd/gocd/discussions/9931>.
>>>>
>>>> The current understanding is that GoCD (by itself) isn't vulnerable, 
>>>> since it doesn't use log4j directly. There is a TFS dependency which uses 
>>>> log4j, but it had been made to use log4j-over-slf4j and then logback from 
>>>> there -- and so, *shouldn't* be vulnerable.
>>>>
>>>> If things change, and more information is found, it might be in that 
>>>> discussion page instead of here.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Aravind
>>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "go-cd" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/go-cd/a1cc672b-e9d5-4496-86c6-35b173cba8dcn%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/go-cd/a1cc672b-e9d5-4496-86c6-35b173cba8dcn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"go-cd" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/go-cd/a82cca04-8737-443d-a679-f3d51f054258n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to