On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, David Goodman wrote: > Steve, I think you misunderstand Greg's concern (and mine) We do not > disagree with what you want to do; we want to add to it. We are > assuming, I think, that something similar to the plan you advocate will > be the basic process. > > I do not think it enough to say distributed = secure. It's only the first > step to security. In addition to being distributed, there also needs to > be a reliable caretaker--not just to do the housekeeping, but to ensure > that the archive is kept compatible with changing technology.
I agree completely. I didn't say distributed = secure (there's a lot more to security than that). I said being freely accessible now, in distributed institutional Eprint archives is a powerful new way to complement being freely accessible in centralized Eprint archives, which are still growing much too slowly. It should not be delayed for one moment by security concerns, not one moment. > I suggested that the archives be organized redundantly both by > discipline and by university (and possibly by geographic/political > entity, as well as what anyone wants to do). Again, complete agreement. > There are undoubtedly well-organized academic departments that can do > this. There are also academic departments that cannot be relied on to > do this right, because of size, interest, or finances. The same goes > for professional societies. Certainly no individual can be relied on: > all humans are mortal. All of this goes as well for refereed as for > unrefereed, preprint as for reprint, officially published as for > unpublished. Agreed, and digital librarians are clearly the pertinent experts. > As a librarian, I do not assume it is good enough that our refereed > papers are already, as they are, safely in the hands of journals and > libraries, ... Yes, but let us not again mix up agendas. There could have been -- independent of any movement to free the refereed literature online -- a movement to increase the security of the on-paper corpus (both papers and books) on-line. That's fine, desirable, but unrelated to this Forum's agenda, which is to FREE the refereed corpus online. Concerns about strengthening the paper literature's current security should not be wrapped into the freeing (now!) initiative for the refereed literature; nor should freeing (now!) be made in any way conditional on first meeting a priori security concerns. Although it is an oversimplification, it is best to treat the freeing initiative as a pure freebie, a windfall, over and above what we have already. We are talking about archiving, not publishing, an extra version of what is already published (on-paper). This face-valid, immediate goal should be kept as distinct from preservation concerns as it should be kept from peer-review-reform concerns (likewise worthy, but orthogonal, and indeed even at cross-purposes if yoked in any way to the freeing initiative). > There are very few library copies of many journals, and though there is > excellent backup from national libraries, even their collections are > incomplete. The literature published up to now will be much more secure > when it too has been digitized and placed on free publicly available > mirrored servers, with all the additional precautions. Besides > security, this will also make them generally available with all the > additional advantages of plans such as yours. David, the securing issue is a separate one from the freeing! The material on the shelves now is not free; nor is it, let us agree, as secure as it might be. Increasing its security by distributed digital back-up is one thing (and need not be freely accessible either); freeing it online is quite another. Please, please keep these two separate or you will only encourage more Zeno's Paralysis! -------------------------------------------------------------------- Stevan Harnad har...@cogsci.soton.ac.uk Professor of Cognitive Science har...@princeton.edu Department of Electronics and phone: +44 23-80 592-582 Computer Science fax: +44 23-80 592-865 University of Southampton http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/ Highfield, Southampton http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/ SO17 1BJ UNITED KINGDOM NOTE: A complete archive of the ongoing discussion of providing free access to the refereed journal literature online is available at the American Scientist September Forum (98 & 99 & 00): http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/American-Scientist-Open-Access-Forum.html You may join the list at the site above. Discussion can be posted to: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@amsci.org