Evidently no one is paying attention, otherwise you would already have been referred to OAIster: http://www.oaister.org/
And as an example of how cross-repository citation search engines will work (once repositories have enough content to make the exercise worthwhile), see: Citebase (mostly just physics now): http://www.citebase.org/ and CiteseerX (mostly just computer science now): http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/ On Wed, 28 May 2008, N. Miradon wrote: > I thank correspondents off-list who drew my attention to Scirus, to Google > Scholar, and to the ISI Web of Knowledge (pay to use; not yet tried). > > On list, Les Carr wrote "While OA stands at 15% or less, there is very > little point in putting a citation-following interface to just the OA > parts > of the literature ..."[1]. > > I hope this does not mean that nobody is working on development of > free-as-in-beer version of Scopus. > > Seems to me that capable software to get material _out_ of repositories > should now be even higher priority than ditto to put it in. > > How else will we arrive at "a seamless, completely interlinked learned > literature at the fingertips of every scholar and scientist in the > world"[2] ? > > N Miradon > > [1] > http://listserver.sigmaxi.org/sc/wa.exe?A2=ind08&L=american-scientist-open > -access-forum&D=1&O=D&F=l&S=&P=43358 > [2] > http://listserver.sigmaxi.org/sc/wa.exe?A2=ind98&L=american-scientist-open > -access-forum&D=1&O=D&F=l&S=&P=48 >