2009/2/24 Stevan Harnad <amscifo...@gmail.com>: > (Re: Phil Davis)Â No, E & R do not show that > > "the vast majority of freely-accessible scientific articles are not > published in OA journals, but are made freely available by non-profit > scientific societies using a subscription model." > > E & R did not even look at the vast majority of freely-accessible articles, > which are the ones self-archived by their authors. E & R looked only at > journals that make their entire contents free after an access-embargo of up > to a year or more.
Is there any empirical evidence that there are more self-archived articles in the web than articles free after an embargo? There is a lot af free backfile access for TA journals. And even you exclude that you have to proof your assertion. Klaus Graf
