On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Chris Zielinski wrote: > His name is Wallace-Wells, everyone, not Wallace-Evans! Nobody seems to be > reading the original...
No, the original is alas indeed being read, but the readers are so appalled by the author's endless substantive misreadings and non-readings that getting the author's name right seems the least of the wrongs crying to be set aright! (If I were this author, I would be rather relieved for any note of uncertainty on auctorial identity!) But thanks to Chris for setting the record straight. http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/778-guid.html
