On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Dana Roth <dzr...@library.caltech.edu> wrote:
> Reme brings up an excellent, if unstated, point ... commercially published > OA journals like commercially published subscription journals are the > problem ... not the society/non-commercial OA and subscription journals. Fancy that! And here I'd been all these years thinking that lack of access was the problem! And that providing open access was the solution. Could it be that we've been talking about different problems all along? No wonder we've made so little progress...
