Interesting results from this survey, some highlighted below from extensive 
Executive summary. 

Survey on open access in FP7
European Commission, 7th Framework Programme, (2012)
http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/survey-on-open-access-in-fp7_en.pdf

The European Commission launched in August 2008 the open access pilot in FP7. 
It concerns all new projects from that date in seven FP7 research areas. Grant 
beneficiaries are expected to deposit peer-reviewed research articles or final 
manuscripts resulting from their projects into an online repository and make 
their best efforts to ensure open access to those articles within a set period 
of time after publication. In addition to the pilot, FP7 rules of participation 
also allow all projects to have open access fees eligible for reimbursement 
during the time of the grant agreement. The EU-funded portal OpenAIRE (‘Open 
Access Infrastructure for Research in Europe’) has supported the pilot since 
2009, with mechanisms for the identification, deposit, access to and monitoring 
of FP7-funded articles. 

Selected results

Almost 70 % of respondents with an opinion think that it is better to use 
self-archiving rather than open access publishing to satisfy the open access 
requirement in FP7. 
Three quarters of those respondents with an opinion would agree or strongly 
agree with an open access mandate for data in their research area, providing 
that all relevant aspects (e.g. ethics, confidentiality, intellectual property) 
have been considered and addressed.


Steve Hitchcock
WAIS Group, Building 32
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Twitter: http://twitter.com/stevehit
Connotea: http://www.connotea.org/user/stevehit
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 9379    Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 9379



_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

Reply via email to