Steven Â
Mandated OA was announced early 2011 for Earsmus University Rotterdam. Unfortunately this has had no effect on deposit rates whatsoever, it is still one of the lowest deposit rates in Nl. Mandates without carrots or sticks are not likely to work, despite the Liege success.  BTW this post was partly inspired by questions you asked in Leiden back in 2010(?) at the van Raan farewell symposium.  Wouter   From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stevan Harnad Sent: vrijdag 10 februari 2012 15:09 To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci) Subject: [GOAL] {Disarmed} Re: A census of OA in the Netherlands  On 2012-02-10, at 8:47 AM, Gerritsma, Wouter wrote: An analysis of OA deposits in Dutch repositories http://wowter.net/2012/02/10/a-census-of-open-access-repositories-in-the-nether lands/  Deposits rates at Dutch universities vary between 7% and 40% for articles. Are well in the 80% for PhD-theses. There remains a lot of work to be done.  Suggestion: Mandate deposit.  Mandated deposit rates are 60%+ rising toward 100%.  Especially with the right mandate: Immediate-Deposit/Optional-Access [ID/OA], Liege model: deposit is designated as the sole mechanism for submitting refereed research for performance review.  Research funders can reinforce institutional mandates by mandating deposit too, as a condition of funding.  http://roarmap.eprints.org   Wouter Gerritsma  Information Specialist â Bibliometrician Wageningen UR Library PO box 9100 6700 HA Wageningen The Netherlands ++31 3174 83052 [email protected] library.wur.nl @wowter wowter.net  MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "x-msg:" claiming to be tinyurl.com/c86gqyr  <image001.png>    _______________________________________________ GOAL mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal  [ Part 2: "Attached Text" ] _______________________________________________ GOAL mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
