Hi Richard, I argued in the September 2012 issue of my newsletter that the RCUK/Finch incentives will lead no-fee OA journals to start charging fees, if only to avoid leaving money on the table. See Section 7 of this article: http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/09-02-12.htm#uk-ec
Today 70% of OA journals (not articles) charge no fees at all. But that that number will very likely approach zero under the new RCUK policy, at least when publishing articles by RCUK-funded authors. Peter Peter Suber bit.ly/suber-gplus On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Richard Poynder <ri...@richardpoynder.co.uk > wrote: > Thanks for the comments David. Your point about not equating Gold OA with > APCs is well taken.**** > > ** ** > > But it also invites a question I think: do we know what percentage of > papers(not journals, but papers) published Gold OA today incur no APC > charge, and what do we anticipate this percentage becoming in a post-Finch > world?**** > > ** ** > > Richard**** > > * * > > *From:* goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] *On > Behalf Of *David Prosser > *Sent:* 11 December 2012 19:53 > *To:* Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci) > *Subject:* [GOAL] Re: Interview with Harvard's Stuart Shieber**** > > ** ** > > As ever, Richard has put together a fascinating and entertaining > interview, and augmented it with a really useful essay on the current state > of OA policies.**** > > ** ** > > I have a small quibble. On page two, Richard writes:**** > > ** ** > > "...or by means of gold OA, in which researchers (or more usually their > funders) pay publishers an article-processing charge (APC) to ensure that > their paper is made freely available on the Web at the time of publication." > **** > > ** ** > > APCs make up just one business model that can be used to support Gold OA. > Gold is OA through journals - it makes no assumption about how the costs > of publication are paid for. I think it is helpful to ensure that we do > not equate Gold with APCs.**** > > ** ** > > David**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On 3 Dec 2012, at 18:51, Richard Poynder wrote:**** > > > > **** > > *Stuart Shieber is the Welch Professor of Computer Science at Harvard > University, **Faculty > Co-Director*<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/sshieber> > * **of the **Berkman Center for Internet and > Society*<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/sshieber> > *, Director of Harvard’s Office for Scholarly Communication > (**OSC*<http://osc.hul.harvard.edu/> > *), and chief architect of the Harvard Open Access > (**OA*<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_access> > *) Policy — a 2008 initiative that has seen Harvard become a major force > in the OA movement.***** > > * ***** > > > http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/the-oa-interviews-harvards-stuart.html > **** > > **** > > <ATT00001..txt>**** > > ** ** > > _______________________________________________ > GOAL mailing list > GOAL@eprints.org > http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal > >
_______________________________________________ GOAL mailing list GOAL@eprints.org http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal