Hi Andrew, It is very difficult to comment on a process where a variety of voices have heard and the final decision is still to be made (ministry, than parliamentary), but yes, article 9 has been the focus of attention for the research community: - the initial draft was rather publisher friendly with long embargoes (12 - 24) and prevention of commercial re-use - the community at large has pushed dramatically reduce embargoes (amendment by CNRS) and even suggest that we should get rid of them (amendment di Cosmo) or leave the author’s manuscript free of any constraint (Inria) - there is an attempt to re-introduce an exemption for TDM which had disappear between an early draft of the law and the one made available for public consultation It seems that the community has been heard and that we may have a more favorable draft at the next stage. Still, the important aspect related to this law is that it made many of use read thoughtfully the Code de la Propriété Intellectuel and converge on the idea that it is not allowing any kind of non remunerated (exclusive) copyright transfer. Quick some good news for French scholars who have been forced to sign such (illegal) CTA. Have a good week-end, Laurent
> Le 30 oct. 2015 à 11:31, Andrew Hyde <ah...@cambridge.org> a écrit : > > Hi all, > > My first time posting a question to the GOAL list. I wondered if anyone in > France or familiar with the Digital Republic bill (Republique Numerique) > could tell me a bit more about its implications for OA to French publicly > funded research (eg. CNRS). > > I've read a bit about the bill in English and have run some things through > Google Translate, now regretting my poor attention in French class in > secondary school. The news articles I've read > <http://www.networkworld.com/article/2995978/opensource-subnet/france-votes-to-expand-open-source-use.html> > make it sounds like a laudable process, open to public consultation on the > Internet, with some popular propositions to reduce proprietary software in > schools and universities in favour of Linux/GNU, as well as proposals to > protect privacy of personal data and encryption. > > Article 9 concerns Open Access > <https://www.republique-numerique.fr/consultations/projet-de-loi-numerique/consultation/consultation/opinions/section-2-travaux-de-recherche-et-de-statistique/article-9-acces-aux-travaux-de-la-recherche-financee-par-des-fonds-publics/versions/une-duree-d-embargo-plus-courte-ne-pas-entraver-le-tdm-fouille-de-texte-et-de-donnees-et-ne-pas-interdire-une-exploitation-commerciale> > to public research. > > I've read contradictory statements about what the bill proposes in terms of > embargoes for Green archiving. This SciELO blog post (October 9) > <http://blog.scielo.org/en/2015/10/09/france-prepares-bill-to-regulate-open-access/> > suggests that the bill proposes that publicly funded research should be made > publicly accessbile without embargo; whereas the statements and annotations > of the article on the Republique Numerique website > <https://www.republique-numerique.fr/consultations/projet-de-loi-numerique/consultation/consultation/opinions/section-2-travaux-de-recherche-et-de-statistique/article-9-acces-aux-travaux-de-la-recherche-financee-par-des-fonds-publics/versions/une-duree-d-embargo-plus-courte-ne-pas-entraver-le-tdm-fouille-de-texte-et-de-donnees-et-ne-pas-interdire-une-exploitation-commerciale> > suggest that there was an original proposal of an embargo of 12 months for > STM and 24 months for HSS, which has now been modified to 6 and 12 months > respectively. I've read one or two comments on Twitter this morning > suggesting that the embargo periods are still very much under discussion. > > The SciELO blog also suggests that there are provisions to encourage text and > data mining and to end the exclusive transfer of copyright of publicly funded > research and data to publishers. I haven't found much detail on these or any > support for Gold. > > I'd be interested to know what the view is on the OA article amongst the OA > community in France and also what people have made of the process to > establish digital rights. I remember that Brazil went through a similar > process with a Digital Rights bill last year > <https://www.indexoncensorship.org/2014/06/brazil-new-global-internet-referee/>, > of course following on from the Snowdon revelations which had a big impact > in Brazil, much of which was weakened by the time it got into law. > > Many thanks for any information you can provide me… > > Andrew Hyde > Development Editor (Open Access) > +44 (0)1223 326031 | @andrewchyde <https://twitter.com/andrewchyde> > > Cambridge University Press > University Printing House, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge, CB2 8BS > > > > > Cambridge University Press is the publishing business of the University of > Cambridge with VAT registered number GB 823 8476 09. Our principal office is > at University Printing House, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge, CB2 8BS, United > Kingdom. > > _______________________________________________ > GOAL mailing list > GOAL@eprints.org <mailto:GOAL@eprints.org> > http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal > <http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal> Laurent Romary INRIA laurent.rom...@inria.fr
_______________________________________________ GOAL mailing list GOAL@eprints.org http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
