Stevan Harnad writes > Shame on SSRN.
Why? I am certainly looking forward to SSRN becoming as undynamic as Mendeley after an Elsevier takeover. > I don't know about Arxiv (needless centralization and its concentrated > expenses are always vulnerabe to faux-benign take-overs) but what's sure is > that the distributed network of Green institutional repositories worldwide > is not for sale, and that is their strength... RePEc can not be bought either. I created it before institutional repositories came along. It is based on the same principles as institutional repositories. -- Cheers, Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel skype:thomaskrichel _______________________________________________ GOAL mailing list GOAL@eprints.org http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
