Yes, but you have to start somewhere!
There is a quote out there (whether accurate or not) that if Henry Ford had asked his customers what they wanted, they would have asked for a faster horse. Who would ever have thought of a self-driving car, or even a flying car well, many, actually and they made it happen! My point is that you have no idea what an exercise of this manner will spin off as a result of the effort that is why it is called research. The goal is a lofty one, but there will be huge wins in scientific language AI along the way. Who knows, it may be necessary for multi-year journeys for lay-person trips to Mars, if something goes wrong with the spaceship along the way (communication delays will be prohibitive to effect any value from Earth; AI will be required for local support). Cheers, Don ----------------------------- Donald Samulack, PhD President, U.S. Operations Cactus Communications, Inc. Editage, a division of Cactus Communications From: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of Heather Morrison Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 1:49 PM To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci) <goal@eprints.org> Subject: [GOAL] Why translating all scholarly knowledge for non-specialists using AI is complicated On July 10 Jason Priem wrote about the AI-powered systems "that help explain and contextualize articles, providing concept maps, automated plain-language translations"... that are part of his project's plan to develop a scholarly search engine aimed at a nonspecialist audience. The full post is available here: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/2018-July/004890.html We share the goal of making all of the world's knowledge available to everyone without restriction, and I agree that reducing the conceptual barrier for the reader is a laudable goal. However, I think it is important to avoid underestimating the size of this challenge and potential for serious problems to arise. Two factors to consider: the current state of AI, and the conceptual challenges of assessing the validity of automated plain-language translations of scholarly works. Current state of AI - a few recent examples of the current status of AI: Vincent, J. (2016). Twitter taught Microsoft's AI chatbot to be a racist asshole in less than a day. The verge. https://www.theverge.com/2016/3/24/11297050/tay-microsoft-chatbot-racist Wong, J. (2018). Amazon working to fix Alexa after users report bursts of 'creepy' laughter. The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/mar/07/amazon-alexa-random-creep y-laughter-company-fixing Meyer, M. (2018). Google should have thought about Duplex's ethical issues before showing it off. Fortune http://fortune.com/2018/05/11/google-duplex-virtual-assistant-ethical-issues -ai-machine-learning/ Quote from Meyer: As prominent sociologist Zeynep Tufekci put it <https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/994233568359575552> : Google Assistant making calls pretending to be human not only without disclosing that its a bot, but adding ummm and aaah to deceive the human on the other end with the room cheering it horrifying. Silicon Valley is ethically lost, rudderless and has not learned a thing. These early instances of AI applications involve the automation of relatively simple, repetitive tasks. According to Amazon, "Echo and other Alexa devices let you instantly connect to Alexa to play music, control your smart home, get information, news, weather, and more using just your voice". This is voice to text translation software that lets users speak to their computers instead of using keystrokes. Google's Duplex demonstration is a robot dialing a restaurant to make a dinner reservation. Translating scholarly knowledge into simple plain text so that everyone can understand it is a lot more complicated, with the degree of complexity depending on the area of research. Some research in education or public policy might be relatively easy to translate. In other areas, articles are written for an expert audience that is assumed to have spent decades acquiring a basic knowledge in a discipline. It is not clear to me that it is even possible to explain advanced concepts to a non-specialist audience without first developing a conceptual progression. Assessing the accuracy and appropriateness of a plain-text translation of a scholarly work intended for a non-specialist audience requires expert understanding of the work and thoughtful understanding of the potential for misunderstandings that could arise. For example, I have never studied physics. I looked at an automated plain-language translation of a physics text I would have no means of assessing whether the translation was accurate or not. I do understand enough medical terminology, scientific and medical research methods to read medical articles and would have some idea if a plain-text translation was accurate. However, I have never worked as a health care practitioner or health care translation researcher, so would not be qualified to assess the work from the perspective of whether the translation could be mis-read by patients (or some patients). In summary, Jason and I share the goal of making all of our scholarly knowledge accessible to everyone, specialists and non-specialists alike. However, in the process of developing tools to accomplish this it is important to understand the size and nature of the challenge and the potential for serious unforeseen consequences. AI is in very early stages. Machines are beginning to learn on their own, but what they are learning is not necessarily what we expected or wanted them to learn, and the impact on humans has been described using words like 'creepy', 'horrifying', and 'unethical'. The task of translating complex scholarly knowledge for a non-specialist knowledge and assessing the validity and appropriateness of the translations is a huge challenge. If this is not understood and plans made to conduct rigorous research on the validity of such translations, the result could be widespread dissemination of incorrect translations. best, Heather Morrison Associate Professor, School of Information Studies, University of Ottawa Professeur Agrégé, École des Sciences de l'Information, Université d'Ottawa heather.morri...@uottawa.ca <mailto:heather.morri...@uottawa.ca> https://uniweb.uottawa.ca/?lang=en#/members/706
_______________________________________________ GOAL mailing list GOAL@eprints.org http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
