Yahoo -UK 

Jagger and Lennon wanted money not revolution: study

AFP - 1 hour 24 mins ago


LONDON (AFP) - Pop culture icons  were clever capitalists who cashed in on the 
mood of the 1960s, not spokesmen for a generation seeking revolution, a British 
academic said Thursday.


Cambridge University historian David Fowler said that so-called "Swinging 
London" was in fact beyond most normal people, "less a golden age for the 
nation's young than a celebration of wealth by its social elite."
"The 1960s are often viewed as the point at which youth culture in this country 
exploded, but in many ways they were the years in which the idea began to fall 
apart," said Fowler.
"Groups like The Beatles were basically capitalists interested in enriching 
themselves through the music industry. They did about as much to represent the 
interests of the nation's young people as The Spice Girls did in the 1990s."
Fowler notes that Rolling Stones frontman Jagger himself, when asked by an 
interviewer whether he was a spokesman for a generation, replied that he was 
just a musician.
The academic, who teaches modern British history in Cambridge, said more 
authentically revolutionary youth movements can be found in the period between 
World War I and World War II.
He singled out a little-known Cambridge student Rolf Gardiner, who was 
fascinated by the concept of Jugendkultur in Germany as a way that young people 
could express themselves more freely and challenge their elders.
Gardiner's cult championed physical labour and rural reconstruction, Fowler 
said, recounting also how he organised naked bathing sessions along the Cam 
river, as an expression of "back to nature" values.
"People forget that real youth movements are about a lot more than spending and 
consumerism -- they are a way of life," added the academic from Clare Hall 
college, Cambridge, author of "Youth Culture In Modern Britain, c.1920-c.1970."
"People like Rolf Gardiner were true cultural subversives, pop stars before pop 
even existed. In terms of the influence he had on giving Britain's young people 
a sense of identity ... he is just as important as Mick Jagger."
The reason the 1960s is perceived as the dawn of youth culture is because of a 
"break in chronology" due to World War II, which left a state of "collective 
amnesia," the academic said.
Groups like the Beatles and the Rolling Stones took advantage of this -- but 
their separation from real fans' lives was reflected in the way they installed 
themselves in grand country houses, while the London "scene" was equally beyond 
most people's purses.
"The world of Swinging London may be viewed as an emblem of youth culture now, 
but it was really for the Michael Caines of this world; an elite who could 
afford it," Fowler said.
=================================
What's ON in the Goanworld :
http://whatsongoanworld.blogspot.com/


      

Reply via email to