========================================================================
Goa's phone numbers change from Nov 10, 2002. Prefix old number with a 2. New numbers 
will be seven-digit 2XXXXXX (where XXXXXX is the old number).
========================================================================

The Judiciary is the one institution many people still have faith in and it
is imperative that the image of these sacred temples that impart justice
should be preserved. After being sworn in on November 8, the new Chief
Justice of India,  G.B. Pattanaik,  said that corruption had dented the
image of the judiciary.  Amidst the continuing debate on the menace of
corruption in public life, the majority in a recent survey were of the
opinion that not only have anti-corruption drives by various agencies failed
but also that the judiciary has proven ineffective in curbing corrupt
practices.

A debate is on whether it is time judges should be judged in view of serious
allegations of misconduct. Just three years ago the Conference of Chief
Justices resolved to adopt a code of conduct for the higher judiciary and
the recent charges of misconduct by judges of various high courts has once
again called for immediate strong steps to ensure judicial accountability.

The charges against some of India's High Court judges are of a very serious
and alarming nature. They range from sexual harassment to rampage in a
restaurant to nepotism. This sorry state of affairs has even prompted
Supreme Court Chief Justice G.B. Pattanaik to conduct independent inquiries
into all the allegations. Chief Justice Pattanaik has announced that if he
is personally satisfied that there is a prima facie case, he may even ask
the concerned judges to resign.

Judges are human and like any other humans are bound to socialise. It has to
be ensured that socialising does not cross the limits by which the Judges
may be prejudiced in arriving at decisions.

Judges should never treat genuine Public Interest litigants as a nuisance.
On the contrary,  the Courts should encourage citizens championing public
causes,  as long as it’s not a private cause under the guise of Public
Interest Litigation.

Any wrong or misconceived judgement should always be challenged by the
advocate or the litigant fearlessly. The only person to be feared is God and
we are all as close to Almighty as any Judge is.

Merit and merit alone should be the sole deciding factor for a Judge in
reaching decisions. The looks or likes of the advocate or the litigant
should never be a consideration.

A judge should also never be pro or anti- government. He should always
maintain safe distance from all the parties to a case. It is also expected
that a good judge will never be revengeful and try to intimidate or harass a
lawyer or litigant whose face he may not like.

Former Chief Justice of India S.P. Bharucha had estimated the extent of
corruption in the judiciary as being 20 per cent. Justice Michael Saldanha
of the Karnataka High Court says it is 33 per cent. It has to be ensured
that the public faith and perception of the judiciary does not waver. With
the media having widely reported that in the Punjab & Haryana HC case, three
judges got personal favours from the Chairman of the Punjab Public Service
Commission,  the common man is bound to believe that something very
outrageous and scandalous has rocked the judiciary.

It is necessary that a mandatory code of conduct be in place in view of the
latest allegations of judicial misconduct:

1.  A Rajasthan HC judge, now transferred, sexually molests a male
constable.

2.  A Rajasthan HC judge and a court staffer offer to settle a litigant's
case if she "obliges" them.

3.  Three Punjab & Haryana HC judges use their positions to get their
nominees selected by Punjab Public Service Commission ex-chief and
scam-accused Ravi Sidhu.

4.  A drunken Madhya Pradesh HC judge uses foul language in an exclusive
club in Bhopal.

5.  Three Karnataka HC judges, accompanied by women, get into a brawl in a
Mysore restaurant

In the Mysore scandal involving three High Court judges, their names, though
in circulation, have not been published. They had reportedly created a
ruckus at a resort on the outskirts of Mysore on the night of November 3.
Accompanied by three women, they celebrated late into the night, until one
of the judges allegedly had a quarrel with another couple. A middle-aged
lawyer from Mysore, who was present at the resort, helped the couple lodge a
complaint with the police.

On arrival the police found the legal bigwigs on the wrong side of the law.
When they failed to register a case, details of the incident were leaked to
the media. It was later revealed that the three women companions of the
judges were practicing advocates who had recently been selected for
appointment to  judicial positions. To add to it all three judges were on
the selection panel. The case of public nuisance was given the aroma of a
sex scandal.

Judges who are currently under a cloud for public misconduct should be
suspended. This is because if the allegations against them are true, it
would erode the faith of the bar and litigants, making it impossible even
for the other judges to continue dispensing justice.

There has to be a laid down procedure for handling complaints against the
judiciary. Disgruntled litigants should not be allowed to make allegations
that can dent the image of a judge. If the charges are proved baseless, it
is imperative that the person who has levelled the charge be held
accountable. Credibility is a judge's greatest asset and to preserve it,
all allegations must be probed.

Currently the Government has no role to play, either as investigator or
enforcer, because of the immunity enjoyed by the higher judiciary. None of
its members can be investigated without the sanction of the Chief Justice.

The Central government is once again contemplating setting up of a National
Judicial Commission, as recommended by the Constitution Review Commission.
It will be chaired by the Chief Justice of India but it is yet to be decided
whether it will deal with appointments alone or whether it will have
stringent powers to deal with instances of misconduct by judges. Until such
time that some mechanism, and that too a credible one, is put in place,  it
is the judges who will have to judge themselves.

Aires Rodrigues
Ribandar


----------------------------------------------------------
What's On In Goa (WOIG): 
Nov 06 Children's book exhibn opens, Walkabout, Anjuna... (all weekdays)
Nov 06 ArtHouse, Calangute: Chaitali's acrylics on canvas till 19.11
Nov 07 Revision of electoral rolls (till Nov 30) See schedule.
Dec 01 Two day conference, Goa Agenda. IT For Society. (Ends 2.12) 
Every Sunday: Music therapy sessions at Moira, 5 pm. 278, N.Portugal

----------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to