========================================================================
Dec 6, 2002, 9.30 am onwards... St Xavier's College Mapusa alumni reunion
========================================================================

The Guwahati High Court lawyers have to be commended for having vehemently
protested over the reported attempt to transfer an allegedly "tainted judge"
from Karnataka to Guwahati.

The tainted judge should have tried his luck in hospitable, fun and
frolicsome Goa.  Chief Minister Manohar Parrikar might have welcomed him
with joined hands if the tainting included  some saffron streaks. We could
have then be treated to late night and weekend court sessions.

In 1997 a code for judges was accepted with the consent of all High Court
judges. The code bars judges from having close association with individual
lawyers and emphasises that the judge should practise a degree of aloofness
consistent with the dignity of the office and that he shall not accept gifts
or hospitality except from his family, close relations and friends. But now,
with the spate of serious allegations against some judges,  it is time the
National Judicial Commission takes shape with a code of conduct for judges
on its agenda.

The Chief Justice of India  G B Pattanaik has  now set up a three-member
committee to probe the Mysore sex scandal involving three Karnataka high
court judges. The committee comprises of two high court chief justices C K
Thakkar (Bombay) and G L Gupta (Kerala) and an Orissa high court judge, A K
Patnaik.

The Chief Justice has reportedly felt that a deeper probe was required into
the allegations against the three Karnataka high court judges, Justices N S
Veerbhadraiah, Chandrasekhariah and V Gopalagowda, after  Karnataka chief
justice N K Jain had submitted certain evidence relating to their alleged
involvement.

The three member committee will verify the allegations regarding the role of
these three judges in "immoral" activities at a Mysore resort and also
listen to their comments on the issue. The committee will also examine
several documents relating to the past conduct of the judges, their trips
abroad and in India and also ascertain as to who accompanied them on those
trips and as to who financed them. The probe is expected to be a formal
judicial inquiry involving examination and cross-examination of witnesses
and representations by lawyers.

If the committee finds that there is substance in the allegations contained
in the complaint and the misconduct disclosed in the allegations is such
that it calls for initiation of proceedings for removal of the judge, the
Chief Justice of India is expected to advise the judge concerned to resign
or seek voluntary retirement.

Justice must not merely be done, but it must also be seen to be done. Every
judge must at all times be conscious that he is under the public gaze and
there should be no act or omission by him which is unbecoming of the high
office he occupies and the public esteem in which his office is held.

Wherever he is and round the clock a judge is always a judge and so all the
acts of omissions and commission by a judge are in the discharge of his
duties.

People with affinity for wealth, women and wine should never misjudge the
system by aspiring to be judges.

Aires Rodrigues
Ribandar



----------------------------------------------------------
CHRISTMAS PARTIES
Dec 21 - GOA-LA, Los Angeles, CA, USA, [EMAIL PROTECTED], +1 (714) 821-6168
Dec 14 - New England Goans, Wellesly, MA, USA, [EMAIL PROTECTED], +1 (603) 673-3762
Dec 14 - Goan Association of New Jersey, Inc., Somerset, NJ, USA, +1 (732) 599-7644

Reply via email to