----------------------------------------------------------
Archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/goa-net/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Goanet2003/
----------------------------------------------------------




> ----- Original Message -----
> From: gerry ferns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 1:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [goancauses] Goa fishermen resist Raymonds tycoon Singhania's
> water sports project.
>
>
> > THREE CHEERS TO THE NERUL FISHERMEN!!! MAY THEIR TRIBE
> > INCREASE AND MULTIPLY SEVENTY TIMES SEVEN!!!!FISHERMEN
> > WERE AMONGST THE FIRST SIGNIFICANT DISCIPLES OF
> > CHRIST- THE UNPARALLELED FISHER OF MANKIND .MAY THEIR
> > MESSAGE SPREAD TO OTHER REMOTE FISHING HAMLETS LIKE
> > MORJIM WHICH MAY NOW BE SELECTED BY MR SINGHANIA FOR
> > HIS WATERSPORTS ACTIVITIES.THE BEER TYCOON OF
> > KINGFISHER FAME HAS ALREADY BEEN FROLICKING AROUND AT
> > SECLUDED MORJIM WHICH IS QUICKLY BECOMING THE  NEW
> > LOCATION FOR RAVE DRUG PARTIES. PREVENTION IS BETTER
> > THAN CURE. BETTER SAFE THAN SORRY LATER!!!!!!
> > --- "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > > Goa fishermen resist Singhania s water sports
> > > project
> > >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > > Devika Sequeira, DH News Service,
> > >
> > > Raymonds tycoon Gautam Singhania s ambitious plan to
> > > run
> > > one of the biggest water sports facilities and
> > > yachting institutes
> > > on Coco Beach in Goa has run into a tide of protests
> > > from local
> > > fishermen, who view the move as a blatant
> > > encroachment on
> > > their traditional livelihood.
> > >
> > > The company has now been asked to look for an
> > > alternative location
> > > by the state s Tourism Minister Micky Pacheco who
> > > had to intervene
> > > to defuse tension in the area this morning. There is
> > > no way I can
> > > accept the situation when people s traditional
> > > livelihood
> > > is threatened, Mr Pacheco said.
> > >
> > > The standoff between the Raymonds facility at Nerul,
> > > across the river
> > > from Panjim, and the fishing village has been
> > > growing for over
> > > a month, after the company began to test-run its
> > > water sports
> > > equipment. It took an ugly turn yesterday when
> > > villagers off loaded
> > > their anger on some staff and equipment of the Coco
> > > Club.
> > >
> > > Though Singhania representative S Vohra claimed that
> > > Raymonds
> > > had spent Rs 2.5 crore and committed another Rs 5
> > > crore on the project,
> > > the company has not acquired a single state
> > > government licence
> > > to operate it. Even Mr Pacheco confirmed this.
> > > According to Nerul
> > > Sarpanch Shashikala Govekar, the company s
> > > application was
> > > unanimously turned down by the panchayat.
> > >
> > > It is not our intention to use any motorised
> > > equipment that will affect
> > > traditional fishing. Our institute is basically
> > > equipped with kayaks,
> > > sail boats and inflatable rafts, Mr Vohra said.
> > >
> > > But the local fishermen insist that five water skis
> > > had already been
> > > in operation, despite their numerous protests to the
> > > Tourism
> > > Department and the captain of ports. The irate crowd
> > > of protesters
> > > most of them from the Ramponkar (traditional
> > > fishermen) community
> > > gathered on the picturesque Coco Beach this morning,
> > > said that under no circumstances would the project
> > > be allowed.
> > >
> > > Nerul, a traditional fishing and agrarian hamlet, is
> > > the latest example
> > > of the conflict of interests between an intrusive
> > > tourism and an
> > > older way of life. In fact protests were also lodged
> > > today against
> > > beer tycoon and MP Vijay Mallya s swanky yacht
> > > anchored just off
> > > Coco Beach. A number of fishing boats have had their
> > > nets ripped
> > > on the yacht s anchor, the fishermen complained.
> > > ------------------------------------------
> > > Deccan Herald, January 23, 2003
> > > ------------------------------------------
>
>
>

Reply via email to