# If Goanet stops reaching you, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] # # Want to check the archives? http://www.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet/ # # Please keep your discussion/tone polite, to reflect respect to others #
##########################################################################
Tim de Mello wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
"We should not forget that this administration inherited a recession after the technology bubble had burst and it was like handing Bush a hand grenade with the pin pulled out."
By the same token we should not forget that Clinton inherited an economy that was already devasted by the Bush Sr. but managed to turn it around in four years.
Tim, you're wrong. The economy had started to recover during Bush Sr.'s last year in office. The third quarter growth rate of his last year in office was 3.4%, a very respectable number. As for managing to turn it around in four years--some credit is due to the fact that there was a Republican-controlled House and Senate. Concerning Clinton turning around a Bush Sr. economy in 4 years, Bush Jr. has acheived the same level of unemployment that Clinton had achieved at the end of his first term--a record which helped Clinton run his re-election on the theme of prosperity.
Bush Jr. inherited a huge surplus (not a recession) - and yes there were problems soon after he took over but he is no Clinton. Not even close. It was just poor governance.Poor governance? One particular quarter last year had an 8.9% growth in GDP. The highest in 19 years. There have been several quarters in which growth has been over 5%, and the average has been over 4%. If you know anything about economics, you know that these are excellent figures. Home ownership is at an all-time high. The "educational gap" has never been narrower between minorities and the rest of the population. BTW, the surplus peaked one month *before* Bush was elected and certainly didn't pick up in the almost three months before he took office.
Nobody called Clinton a "moron" or "stupid" publicly.
Okay, perhaps they said that privately. People can be very civil sometimes.
I just feel sorry for all the Americans who have lost their jobs because of this administration. A bad economy in America negatively affects a large part of the world.Don't feel too sorry. Lost jobs *because* of this administration? Unless the administration caused the attacks of September 11, which led to a loss of one million jobs. The recession, which was inherited, also led to a huge loss of jobs. Almost a million new jobs have been created by this administration for every one of the last 14 months. Not a bad record, eh? This may explain why more than 3/5ths of Americans say that they are better off today than they were 4 years ago.
For those in India who may be not aware - being jobless in America is a very miserable experience. Particularly in the cold months. For many the choice is "to eat or to heat".It can be miserable. The average "poor" American owns a 2-bedroom home, three television sets, a car, and subscribes to cable TV. Talking about being miserable, the misery index--a factor of unemployment and inflation--is lower than it was when Clinton left office.
I hope the Americans do not vote Bush Jr. back into office.
I'm sorry that you want to bring a curse upon America.
Sincerely, Peter D'Souza
