##########################################################################
# If Goanet stops reaching you, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] # # Want to check the archives? http://www.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet/ # # Please keep your discussion/tone polite, to reflect respect to others #
##########################################################################


Santosh wrote that he will "continue to oppose his policies as long as
they remain radically tilted to the right."  Seems to me that he is
saying that anything that is radically tilted to the right is by
definition wrong.  Does not mount to much of an argument, since one can
say that anything one is opposed to is radically tilted.  And what about
radically tilted to the left?  And who is to decide?

What I am trying to say is that one should oppose or support based on
merits of the case, and not because it is perceived to have a tilt.
Even a person who is tilted to a direction that one does  not prefer may
well make sense in certain cases.

Sachin Phadte

_________________________________________________________________
The happening world of BPO! Know all that you need to know! http://www.bpowatchindia.com/msn/ Keep in step with what’s hot!





Reply via email to